I have said previously that I just do not “get” Twitter yet. However, I have read two articles recently that provide a corporate-centric argument for paying attention to Twitter. The first article was from TechCrunch regarding Michael Arrington’s problems with Comcast. So, to summarize his story, his internet was down and an automated message from customer service stated service should resume within 30 minutes. As a typical net-addict, he found friends, cafes and any other way to get online for 36 hours. Then he ranted on Twitter.
And this brings me to the point of this post. Within 20 minutes of my first Twitter message I got a call from a Comcast executive in Philadelphia who wanted to know how he could help. He said he monitors Twitter and blogs to get an understanding of what people are saying about Comcast, and so he saw the discussion break out around my messages.
Obviously, Arrington’s situation changed in a hurry. I found this extremely interesting given Comcast’s history as a slow responding company. This brings me to the second article I read on ChurchOfTheCustomer.com. Jackie had posted a tweet about one of Salesforce.com’s products, and was surprised when someone responded so quickly. The person responding had set up a Yahoo Pipe to track online mentions of Salesforce.com. Now for the cool part:
Kingsley’s pipe tracks online mentions of Salesforce and other company products across social media sites like Flickr, Technorati, Bloglines, Digg, Techmeme, YouTube, Friendfeed and Quotably
Tweetscan (for Twitter.)
Kingsley is kind; he coded a generic pipe for CotC readers to track mentions about your company. Here’s the pipe.
The article describes the process of using the pipe. Given these situations, I can see reasons for following Twitter. The corporate support perspective is much more interesting. How would people respond if Dell started monitoring online comments and emailed bloggers and tweeters (or is it twitterers) when they mentioned problems? This type of proactive customer service could be a major industry movement. Salesforce has always been at the top of their game. Comcast used to be, but fell into issues probably due to their extreme growth. But if Comcast can adopt online monitoring as a basis for their customer service, it completely changes the company as well as people’s perceptions of the company. Arrington could have been a major thorn in Comcast’s side, but almost became an advertisement for them.
Is online mention monitoring the future of customer service? Given these two stories, I think the future looks bright.
UPDATE: ReadWriteWeb has a fantastic followup article to all of this. They also include a bunch of twitter users that can help you when you have problems with their company.
15 thoughts on “The Twitterization of Customer Service”
Good Layout and design. I like your blog. I just added your RSS feed to my Google News Reader. .
[…] unknown […]
Thanks for reading! I always love to hear from subscribers. Looks like my post was right up your alley as well.
Oh…it’s a pity I work for a company I cannot “track”. Maybe the past one, that was called “Enterprise” (Yes, actually “Enterprise”!), but not this one, for sure…
Well, the Yahoo pipe seems to be fairly generic. So it is possible to “track” any terms you would like. The real problem with any type of search is finding a term that is specific enough.
“The real problem with any type of search is finding a term that is specific enough.”
You got it!
I work for a company named “Reply” (a big IT group in Europe (Italy, Germany, England). Looking for statements containing the word “Reply” maybe is not that useful! 😀
Yeah, that would be difficult. Maybe something like Reply IT or whatever other keywords or service marks (like Inc. in the US) would help. In any case, I agree you would have a difficult time getting a useful search.
Thanks for the mention. To be perfectly honest, I’ve been overwhelmed by the response to my little experiment. Tracking social media is a good idea in theory, but operationally very difficult. The pipe was an attempt to throw more technology at it. I think it succeeded at that, and now that forces me to think about what, if anything we should formalize.
Honestly, when something that cool hits be prepared. Pipes are something that has only had limited success. I am not sure if it is the complexity or just the difficulty of data integration. I admit I had difficulty figuring out the Pipe itself. In any case, bravo on excellent work and hopefully the trend of new customer service will begin.
[…] The Twitterization of Customer Service […]
Thanks for the mention of the RWW article! 🙂 I just wanted to provide the link since yours isn’t working:
I had tried to use some other link on the site instead of the URL (forget where I found it). I have updated it accordingly.
I also have no problem mentioning RWW. I read it religiously and find fantastic information there. Probably my favorite “tech news” site.
[…] a story or a blog post. You are tracking mentions of the keyword. I even talked a bit about this in The Twitterization of Customer Service, when Michael Arrington had his problems with […]
[…] (13) The Twitterization of Customer Service Twitter started as a quick way (140 characters or less) to post some information. Microblogging has […]
friend has given the link has not regretted that has come
Comments are closed.