Yesterday, Richard MacManus of ReadWriteWeb wrote about the RSS reader market being in disarray.
One of the interesting trends of 2009 has been the gradual decline of RSS Readers as a way for people to keep up with news and niche topics. Many of us still use them, but less than we used to.
Richard has a very early adopter angle on things, so he tends to use Twitter for finding news. This makes sense given his position at ReadWriteWeb and many other early adopters feel the same way.
This morning we had a response from Jeff Nolan at Venture Chronicles, where he stated that there is no RSS market.
The problem isn’t that the market is in disarray but rather that there is no “market” for something that is, in spite of being free across the board, not growing in end users or with publishers. On any given day there are likely no more than 1 million active RSS users, and half of those are committed to Google Reader which is a pretty good product at this point. This may sound like a large pool of users but it most certainly is not when it comes to formulating a product strategy…
Jeff also has a different angle than most people, he is looking at this like a venture capitalist. As a VC, you will likely look at a product to determine if it will gain adoption from the mainstream user. Obviously, that will never happen with RSS readers.
The problem with both perspectives is that they are assuming RSS readers needed to go mainstream in order to be successful. This also tends to be the standard of what most people consider as successful. However, there are tons of products that are hugely successful in their niche. Look at CAD software. There is a very limited number of customers for CAD software, but CAD companies can make millions of dollars per year. The real question is whether the niche can sustain a product at all. That is a different question because of the prevalence of free RSS readers.
However, what if we broadened the RSS reader term? In reality, what are sites like Digg or Reddit? Are they not just RSS readers with voting attached? Granted, they do not look like Google Reader or Bloglines, but who says they need to? Can we say that Digg and Reddit have been very successful and gaining significant adoption?
This becomes a more interesting question when people post numerous links to blog posts on Twitter. Richard states he uses Twitter to “find news”. There are also a few applications that mine Twitter for links and display them as a news site.
The definition of RSS reader has been limited due to the implementation of the tools currently implemented. The presentation of RSS is where many sites tend to fail. In many cases, they want to look like Google Reader or Bloglines because that is what an RSS reader is supposed to look like. If you have looked at Netvibes recently, you will see that they have attempted to move away from RSS reader presentation and closer to a news site. This is likely the direction many sites will take in the future.
RSS readers are news sites for geeks or those people that do not want the clutter a major news site gives them. RSS readers allow these people to read or skim everything that they have decided is worth their attention. In many cases, the people using RSS readers are the people that post those interesting links to Twitter. It is possible, those people using an RSS reader are the curators for the news you now read. So, are RSS readers dead? Nope, they are just niche products that will continue to have a strong future until something truly disrupts how we get information.
11 thoughts on “RSS Readers Are Fine, But They Are Niche Products”
[…] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Rob Diana, Mahendra Palsule. Mahendra Palsule said: RT @robdiana: RegularGeek post: RSS Readers Are Fine, But They Are Niche Products http://bit.ly/77zwSR […]
[…] RSS Readers Are Fine, But They Are Niche Products (regulargeek.com) var addthis_pub = 'dallisonlee'; var addthis_language = 'en';var addthis_options = 'email, favorites, twitter, digg, delicious, myspace, google, facebook, reddit, live, more'; Uncategorized […]
Good summary of the situation, Rob.
It’s funny, though, because although I was originally attracted to Netvibes because of its interface, I’ve mainly come to resort to using Google Reader because of the ways that you can use categories.
The problem I have with sites like Netvibes is that I do not want that type of visual clutter when reading my RSS feeds. They work for some people, but I am trying to read a lot of information at one time. Google Reader works very well for me in that situation.
In the paper era, only librarians had subscriptions to a significant number of industry periodicals. They curated and digested them for wider consumption in simpler forms. Now everyone can be a librarian, but only the power users really want to – so it is quite natural that the market for their specialized tools is limited. Besides, I haven’t heard anyone complain that compilers haven’t gone mainstream. Like tools used by developers, RSS readers are often built by the same class of people as the one who use them. But VC despair not : RSS is also the technology for the most of invisible links that currently percolate news from site to site – there are plenty of opportunities to do business over that, and it does not look like an RSS reader.
I almost used the compiler example, but I figured that many compilers are freely available as well now. The librarian and power user example you give is exactly what I am thinking about.
Given that almost every major news site or blog distributes their content via Twitter, would you not agree that Twitter is also an RSS Reader?
And in that case, there is still very much an RSS market.
I had thought about the “Twitter is an RSS reader” argument, but it is not just the presentation that is different. The whole paradigm of Twitter is much different. You can use Twitter as a proxy for an RSS reader because there is a lot of curation that goes into the links that get shared. I am also trying to draw a fine line between RSS reader products and reading stuff that happens to be shared through RSS technology.
Yes, I agree about this fine line. Another thing that blurs this line even more is the share function of many RSS Readers, which in a sense makes them distribution platforms as well. I’ve found new value recently in Google Reader’s shared items from people in my network, and I can’t help but wonder how many others are giving it a second chance as well.
[…] RSS Readers Are Fine, But They Are Niche Products […]
[…] en Internet, acerca de que si los lectores de RSS son relevantes, de que si hay un mercado, de que si son productos de nicho, etc. Esto es una cosa periódica en algunos círculos de los comentaristas y escritores de […]
Comments are closed.