<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Google Me Needs To Succeed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://regulargeek.com/2010/06/29/what-google-me-needs-to-succeed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://regulargeek.com/2010/06/29/what-google-me-needs-to-succeed/</link>
	<description>Where programming, the internet and social media collide.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 05:30:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is GoogleMe a Reality? &#124; Word Grrls</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2010/06/29/what-google-me-needs-to-succeed/comment-page-1/#comment-4305</link>
		<dc:creator>Is GoogleMe a Reality? &#124; Word Grrls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 11:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=1884#comment-4305</guid>
		<description>[...] say it will be called GoogleMe. Here is what I wrote in a comment about the idea for GoogleMe at Regular Geek. Google is on the wrong path if they target LinkedIn as a style for GoogleMe. Facebook is the model [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] say it will be called GoogleMe. Here is what I wrote in a comment about the idea for GoogleMe at Regular Geek. Google is on the wrong path if they target LinkedIn as a style for GoogleMe. Facebook is the model [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2010/06/29/what-google-me-needs-to-succeed/comment-page-1/#comment-4293</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 20:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=1884#comment-4293</guid>
		<description>Google is on the wrong path if they target LinkedIn as a style for GoogleMe. Facebook is the model they should use. LinkedIn is pretty stagnant as far as I am concerned. Meanwhile Facebook continues to grow no matter what is said about it&#039;s security and privacy of information. It&#039;s those damned game applications in my experience. I can&#039;t ever login in there without having a dozen or so invitations to join and requests to send cows and etc. Most come from relatives I hardly see otherwise. Anyway, GoogleMe should be geared down to the masses rather than geared to the professional types who want to connect socially in a professional way. If they design GoogleMe for the casual user they could have a real winner and competetion for Facebook in reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google is on the wrong path if they target LinkedIn as a style for GoogleMe. Facebook is the model they should use. LinkedIn is pretty stagnant as far as I am concerned. Meanwhile Facebook continues to grow no matter what is said about it&#8217;s security and privacy of information. It&#8217;s those damned game applications in my experience. I can&#8217;t ever login in there without having a dozen or so invitations to join and requests to send cows and etc. Most come from relatives I hardly see otherwise. Anyway, GoogleMe should be geared down to the masses rather than geared to the professional types who want to connect socially in a professional way. If they design GoogleMe for the casual user they could have a real winner and competetion for Facebook in reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Diana</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2010/06/29/what-google-me-needs-to-succeed/comment-page-1/#comment-4006</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Diana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 20:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=1884#comment-4006</guid>
		<description>Keenan

I understand what you are saying, but I think a lot of people (including myself) are assuming that when Google Me goes live many people will be members of the network. The main assumption is that people using Google accounts in some way, GMail, Reader or anything else, will be automatically added as well as all of their contacts being linked or prompted to be linked.

To your point, if Google builds something but does not automatically add users based on things like GMail, it will fail. As you said, in that case there is no reason to leave Facebook.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keenan</p>
<p>I understand what you are saying, but I think a lot of people (including myself) are assuming that when Google Me goes live many people will be members of the network. The main assumption is that people using Google accounts in some way, GMail, Reader or anything else, will be automatically added as well as all of their contacts being linked or prompted to be linked.</p>
<p>To your point, if Google builds something but does not automatically add users based on things like GMail, it will fail. As you said, in that case there is no reason to leave Facebook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keenan</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2010/06/29/what-google-me-needs-to-succeed/comment-page-1/#comment-4005</link>
		<dc:creator>Keenan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 20:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=1884#comment-4005</guid>
		<description>Everyone is talking about the features and functions.  

I think this is a BIG mistake.  I posted about it yesterday.   Social networking has entered the mature phase of the product or business life cycle.  There are few &quot;new&quot; users for Google to go get.  Only late majority or laggards are left.  Google will have to get users to switch and the problem with that is the value of a social network IS the network.   

No one is going to leave Facebook for a Google Me when none of their friends are there and they&#039;ve got so much invested in FB.   

The value of FB is the network.  Google can&#039;t control that so the value they bring is VERY low.  No amount of &quot;technology&quot; or features and functions will change that. 

My thoughts on this: http://bit.ly/bGzHtA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone is talking about the features and functions.  </p>
<p>I think this is a BIG mistake.  I posted about it yesterday.   Social networking has entered the mature phase of the product or business life cycle.  There are few &#8220;new&#8221; users for Google to go get.  Only late majority or laggards are left.  Google will have to get users to switch and the problem with that is the value of a social network IS the network.   </p>
<p>No one is going to leave Facebook for a Google Me when none of their friends are there and they&#8217;ve got so much invested in FB.   </p>
<p>The value of FB is the network.  Google can&#8217;t control that so the value they bring is VERY low.  No amount of &#8220;technology&#8221; or features and functions will change that. </p>
<p>My thoughts on this: <a href="http://bit.ly/bGzHtA" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/bGzHtA</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Me: Una copia de Facebook (o eso dicen los rumores) &#171; El Rincón del Ornitorrinco</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2010/06/29/what-google-me-needs-to-succeed/comment-page-1/#comment-3999</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Me: Una copia de Facebook (o eso dicen los rumores) &#171; El Rincón del Ornitorrinco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 15:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=1884#comment-3999</guid>
		<description>[...] What Google Me Needs To Succeed [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What Google Me Needs To Succeed [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Diana</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2010/06/29/what-google-me-needs-to-succeed/comment-page-1/#comment-3997</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Diana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 23:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=1884#comment-3997</guid>
		<description>Stephen

Yes, Google does have most of the foundation in various applications, and they do just need to pull it all together. It just isn&#039;t that easy though.

They do have a trusted brand, and they will get a ton of people trying it out. However, Google has had privacy concerns of their own in the past, so we can only hope they will do a better job this time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen</p>
<p>Yes, Google does have most of the foundation in various applications, and they do just need to pull it all together. It just isn&#8217;t that easy though.</p>
<p>They do have a trusted brand, and they will get a ton of people trying it out. However, Google has had privacy concerns of their own in the past, so we can only hope they will do a better job this time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Diana</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2010/06/29/what-google-me-needs-to-succeed/comment-page-1/#comment-3996</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Diana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 23:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=1884#comment-3996</guid>
		<description>rbet,

Basically we seem to be agreeing for the most part, and just disagreeing on some timing. I do see your point though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rbet,</p>
<p>Basically we seem to be agreeing for the most part, and just disagreeing on some timing. I do see your point though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Tong</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2010/06/29/what-google-me-needs-to-succeed/comment-page-1/#comment-3995</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Tong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 22:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=1884#comment-3995</guid>
		<description>Google already has the foundation for a social media success. They just need to implement it all together into one place and they will be successful. 

Also with the trusted brand they should have no problems getting people to try it out and maybe do a better job at managing privacy and other issues that facebook struggles with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google already has the foundation for a social media success. They just need to implement it all together into one place and they will be successful. </p>
<p>Also with the trusted brand they should have no problems getting people to try it out and maybe do a better job at managing privacy and other issues that facebook struggles with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.384 seconds -->

