<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Traditional Programming Language Job Trends &#8211; February 2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://regulargeek.com/2010/02/02/traditional-programming-language-job-trends-february-2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://regulargeek.com/2010/02/02/traditional-programming-language-job-trends-february-2010/</link>
	<description>Where programming, the internet and social media collide.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 05:30:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: How to delvelop .Net Apps on iPad &#38; iPhone &#124; Digitify</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2010/02/02/traditional-programming-language-job-trends-february-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-3624</link>
		<dc:creator>How to delvelop .Net Apps on iPad &#38; iPhone &#124; Digitify</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 19:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=1424#comment-3624</guid>
		<description>[...] Traditional Programming Language Job Trends &#8211; February 2010 (regulargeek.com) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Traditional Programming Language Job Trends &#8211; February 2010 (regulargeek.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NoSQL Job Trends - March 2010 &#124; Regular Geek</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2010/02/02/traditional-programming-language-job-trends-february-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-3603</link>
		<dc:creator>NoSQL Job Trends - March 2010 &#124; Regular Geek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 13:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=1424#comment-3603</guid>
		<description>[...] in March 14th, 2010  Posted by Rob Diana in Career, Programming In the past, I have posted about job trends for traditional programming languages as well as Web 2.0 programming languages. This is really just the tip of the iceberg when it comes [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in March 14th, 2010  Posted by Rob Diana in Career, Programming In the past, I have posted about job trends for traditional programming languages as well as Web 2.0 programming languages. This is really just the tip of the iceberg when it comes [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web 2.0 Programming Language Job Trends - February 2010 &#124; Regular Geek</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2010/02/02/traditional-programming-language-job-trends-february-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-3570</link>
		<dc:creator>Web 2.0 Programming Language Job Trends - February 2010 &#124; Regular Geek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 13:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=1424#comment-3570</guid>
		<description>[...] in March 1st, 2010  Posted by Rob Diana in Career, Programming At the beginning of this month, I compared the job trends for traditional programming languages like C++, Java and others. That was initially done because of TIOBE releasing their yearly language [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in March 1st, 2010  Posted by Rob Diana in Career, Programming At the beginning of this month, I compared the job trends for traditional programming languages like C++, Java and others. That was initially done because of TIOBE releasing their yearly language [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crunchhead&#39;s Corner</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2010/02/02/traditional-programming-language-job-trends-february-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-3560</link>
		<dc:creator>Crunchhead&#39;s Corner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=1424#comment-3560</guid>
		<description>[...] http://regulargeek.com/2010/02/02/traditional-programming-language-job-trends-february-2010/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://regulargeek.com/2010/02/02/traditional-programming-language-job-trends-february-2010/" rel="nofollow">http://regulargeek.com/2010/02.....uary-2010/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ponderi</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2010/02/02/traditional-programming-language-job-trends-february-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-3528</link>
		<dc:creator>Ponderi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=1424#comment-3528</guid>
		<description>In South Africa, Java Programmers are paid more than PHP or .Net Programmers. Thats a fact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In South Africa, Java Programmers are paid more than PHP or .Net Programmers. Thats a fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ponderi</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2010/02/02/traditional-programming-language-job-trends-february-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-3527</link>
		<dc:creator>Ponderi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=1424#comment-3527</guid>
		<description>Java all the way the best. I couldnt agree more.

Its undisputable</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Java all the way the best. I couldnt agree more.</p>
<p>Its undisputable</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Posts about Programming from google blogs as of February 2, 2010 &#171; tryfly.com</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2010/02/02/traditional-programming-language-job-trends-february-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-3488</link>
		<dc:creator>Posts about Programming from google blogs as of February 2, 2010 &#171; tryfly.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 23:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=1424#comment-3488</guid>
		<description>[...] hosting,blogger,forum,managing,software &#8230;   Traditional Programming Language Job Trends &#8211; February 2010 &#8230; &#8211; regulargeek.com 02/02/2010 What does all this mean? Well, Java is still hot and continues [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] hosting,blogger,forum,managing,software &#8230;   Traditional Programming Language Job Trends &#8211; February 2010 &#8230; &#8211; regulargeek.com 02/02/2010 What does all this mean? Well, Java is still hot and continues [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Diana</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2010/02/02/traditional-programming-language-job-trends-february-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-3486</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Diana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 17:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=1424#comment-3486</guid>
		<description>Kevin

I did not want to make any &quot;best&quot; or &quot;highest paying&quot; remarks mainly because the data is not readily available. Also, the type of job is a very important consideration as well. Contract jobs and full time employee jobs are significantly different from one another.

Also, it is hard to justify whether a large number of java jobs will lessen the price paid for those jobs. It could be that it is in such great demand, that positions cannot be filled. That creates a heavy demand for quality developers, which would raise their packages. Without having a complete view of the job market (jobs posted, filled and compensation packages), you really cannot make many inferences except for current demand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin</p>
<p>I did not want to make any &#8220;best&#8221; or &#8220;highest paying&#8221; remarks mainly because the data is not readily available. Also, the type of job is a very important consideration as well. Contract jobs and full time employee jobs are significantly different from one another.</p>
<p>Also, it is hard to justify whether a large number of java jobs will lessen the price paid for those jobs. It could be that it is in such great demand, that positions cannot be filled. That creates a heavy demand for quality developers, which would raise their packages. Without having a complete view of the job market (jobs posted, filled and compensation packages), you really cannot make many inferences except for current demand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.449 seconds -->

