<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ChromeOS Will Fail, Unless Its Purpose Is Not To Succeed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://regulargeek.com/2009/11/20/chromeos-will-fail-unless-its-purpose-is-not-to-succeed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/11/20/chromeos-will-fail-unless-its-purpose-is-not-to-succeed/</link>
	<description>Where programming, the internet and social media collide.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:27:42 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Google Chrome OS &#8211; the morning after still has people not get it</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/11/20/chromeos-will-fail-unless-its-purpose-is-not-to-succeed/comment-page-1/#comment-3243</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Chrome OS &#8211; the morning after still has people not get it</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=1263#comment-3243</guid>
		<description>[...] ChromeOS Will Fail, Unless Its Purpose Is Not To Succeed &#8211; Regular Geek The second reason, which many blogs have not stated, is that everyone knows this will fail. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ChromeOS Will Fail, Unless Its Purpose Is Not To Succeed &#8211; Regular Geek The second reason, which many blogs have not stated, is that everyone knows this will fail. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle Brady</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/11/20/chromeos-will-fail-unless-its-purpose-is-not-to-succeed/comment-page-1/#comment-3242</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Brady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=1263#comment-3242</guid>
		<description>Hey Rob,

Not a defender of Google, just reason and practicality.

One of the main points people are failing to understand about this is that it&#039;s essentially just another GUI for the Linux kernel.  It&#039;s not some super special new OS, but just a pairing down of hardware and software features with a new window dressing.  That&#039;s all it is.

This sort of Operating System has not only limited scope but limited practical use - I have a netbook, but at any given moment I can be running Pidgin, Firefox, Netbeans, Notepad++, StarUML, FileZilla, gimp, or a number of other products.

All of which are definitively not browser-interface resources.

To me, this is about as useful as the OLPC product in a, say, San Francisco environment.

--Kyle</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Rob,</p>
<p>Not a defender of Google, just reason and practicality.</p>
<p>One of the main points people are failing to understand about this is that it&#8217;s essentially just another GUI for the Linux kernel.  It&#8217;s not some super special new OS, but just a pairing down of hardware and software features with a new window dressing.  That&#8217;s all it is.</p>
<p>This sort of Operating System has not only limited scope but limited practical use &#8211; I have a netbook, but at any given moment I can be running Pidgin, Firefox, Netbeans, Notepad++, StarUML, FileZilla, gimp, or a number of other products.</p>
<p>All of which are definitively not browser-interface resources.</p>
<p>To me, this is about as useful as the OLPC product in a, say, San Francisco environment.</p>
<p>&#8211;Kyle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Diana</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/11/20/chromeos-will-fail-unless-its-purpose-is-not-to-succeed/comment-page-1/#comment-3241</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Diana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=1263#comment-3241</guid>
		<description>Kyle

I thought you were a protector of Google :)

Seriously though, I am not sure if it is a stupid idea to have a lightweight, web optimized OS. Honestly, it sounds like a decent idea, but the implementation so far is lacking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kyle</p>
<p>I thought you were a protector of Google <img src='http://regulargeek.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Seriously though, I am not sure if it is a stupid idea to have a lightweight, web optimized OS. Honestly, it sounds like a decent idea, but the implementation so far is lacking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle Brady</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/11/20/chromeos-will-fail-unless-its-purpose-is-not-to-succeed/comment-page-1/#comment-3240</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Brady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=1263#comment-3240</guid>
		<description>But what about the &quot;it still is a stupid idea and sucks&quot; reason it&#039;s not going to succeed?

Because that&#039;s even closer to the truth.

--Kyle</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But what about the &#8220;it still is a stupid idea and sucks&#8221; reason it&#8217;s not going to succeed?</p>
<p>Because that&#8217;s even closer to the truth.</p>
<p>&#8211;Kyle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention ChromeOS Will Fail, Unless Its Purpose Is Not To Succeed &#124; Regular Geek -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/11/20/chromeos-will-fail-unless-its-purpose-is-not-to-succeed/comment-page-1/#comment-3238</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention ChromeOS Will Fail, Unless Its Purpose Is Not To Succeed &#124; Regular Geek -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=1263#comment-3238</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Constable Kidd, twitips MV. twitips MV said: ChromeOS Will Fail, Unless Its Purpose Is Not To Succeed: Google sort of released ChromeOS yesterday. I say .. http://bit.ly/15T7Wq [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Constable Kidd, twitips MV. twitips MV said: ChromeOS Will Fail, Unless Its Purpose Is Not To Succeed: Google sort of released ChromeOS yesterday. I say .. <a href="http://bit.ly/15T7Wq" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/15T7Wq</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Diana</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/11/20/chromeos-will-fail-unless-its-purpose-is-not-to-succeed/comment-page-1/#comment-3237</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Diana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=1263#comment-3237</guid>
		<description>Veera

The main reason I pointed out local storage is that it is a fundamental concept. Even if it is planned for development, it is very surprising to &quot;release&quot; the project without it. I know Gears is talked about a lot, but no local storage makes it much more difficult to work with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Veera</p>
<p>The main reason I pointed out local storage is that it is a fundamental concept. Even if it is planned for development, it is very surprising to &#8220;release&#8221; the project without it. I know Gears is talked about a lot, but no local storage makes it much more difficult to work with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Veera</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/11/20/chromeos-will-fail-unless-its-purpose-is-not-to-succeed/comment-page-1/#comment-3236</link>
		<dc:creator>Veera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=1263#comment-3236</guid>
		<description>Agree on your view.

Regarding the local storage, Chrome OS might be building some web services/storage as part of their OS development in order to allow the user to store and review their documents before uploading to the target site (like, youtube or Flickr!).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree on your view.</p>
<p>Regarding the local storage, Chrome OS might be building some web services/storage as part of their OS development in order to allow the user to store and review their documents before uploading to the target site (like, youtube or Flickr!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.556 seconds -->
