<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Did Intuit Buy Mint?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://regulargeek.com/2009/09/14/why-did-intuit-buy-mint/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/09/14/why-did-intuit-buy-mint/</link>
	<description>Where programming, the internet and social media collide.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:33:13 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Happy 2nd Birthday Regular Geek &#124; Regular Geek</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/09/14/why-did-intuit-buy-mint/comment-page-1/#comment-3321</link>
		<dc:creator>Happy 2nd Birthday Regular Geek &#124; Regular Geek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 14:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=765#comment-3321</guid>
		<description>[...] Why Did Intuit Buy Mint [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why Did Intuit Buy Mint [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bummer</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/09/14/why-did-intuit-buy-mint/comment-page-1/#comment-3033</link>
		<dc:creator>bummer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 15:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=765#comment-3033</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a little behind the times on this one, but just wanted to say I use Mint.com and love it.  Also, in my experience I&#039;ve noticed if Intuit can charge money for something they will, so we can look forward to a great free service becoming a pay service.  Booooo!  :-\</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a little behind the times on this one, but just wanted to say I use Mint.com and love it.  Also, in my experience I&#8217;ve noticed if Intuit can charge money for something they will, so we can look forward to a great free service becoming a pay service.  Booooo!  :-\</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: foo</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/09/14/why-did-intuit-buy-mint/comment-page-1/#comment-2964</link>
		<dc:creator>foo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 05:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=765#comment-2964</guid>
		<description>In my experience, every time a bigger company (especially a publicly traded company) buys a smaller company, they suck the life out of it and run it into the ground.  Everything becomes about how much they can make the shareholders and the customers (and employees) just become numbers and dollar signs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my experience, every time a bigger company (especially a publicly traded company) buys a smaller company, they suck the life out of it and run it into the ground.  Everything becomes about how much they can make the shareholders and the customers (and employees) just become numbers and dollar signs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Intuit proves personal finance innovation is Mint &#8211; Michelle A. Heath</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/09/14/why-did-intuit-buy-mint/comment-page-1/#comment-2947</link>
		<dc:creator>Intuit proves personal finance innovation is Mint &#8211; Michelle A. Heath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 21:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=765#comment-2947</guid>
		<description>[...] got the answers they wanted given today&#8217;s news. I can see exactly what they see in Mint. As Rob at Regular Geek points out, it was born in the glory days of Web 2.0 and comes without all the baggage of Web 1.0 software [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] got the answers they wanted given today&#8217;s news. I can see exactly what they see in Mint. As Rob at Regular Geek points out, it was born in the glory days of Web 2.0 and comes without all the baggage of Web 1.0 software [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: website</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/09/14/why-did-intuit-buy-mint/comment-page-1/#comment-2936</link>
		<dc:creator>website</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 21:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=765#comment-2936</guid>
		<description>To impress a girl.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To impress a girl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Marley (makin257) 's status on Monday, 21-Sep-09 18:33:14 UTC - Identi.ca</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/09/14/why-did-intuit-buy-mint/comment-page-1/#comment-2935</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Marley (makin257) 's status on Monday, 21-Sep-09 18:33:14 UTC - Identi.ca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=765#comment-2935</guid>
		<description>[...] http://regulargeek.com/2009/09/14/why-did-intuit-buy-mint/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://regulargeek.com/2009/09/14/why-did-intuit-buy-mint/" rel="nofollow">http://regulargeek.com/2009/09.....-buy-mint/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Technology Blog: Why Did Intuit Buy Mint</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/09/14/why-did-intuit-buy-mint/comment-page-1/#comment-2934</link>
		<dc:creator>The Technology Blog: Why Did Intuit Buy Mint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=765#comment-2934</guid>
		<description>[...] this purchase? And what does this mean for other online personal finance tools like Wesabe?Source:http://regulargeek.com/2009/09/14/why-did-intuit-buy-mint/      Posted by Makin   at [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this purchase? And what does this mean for other online personal finance tools like Wesabe?Source:http://regulargeek.com/2009/09/14/why-did-intuit-buy-mint/      Posted by Makin   at [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Myspace Cursors</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/09/14/why-did-intuit-buy-mint/comment-page-1/#comment-2933</link>
		<dc:creator>Myspace Cursors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=765#comment-2933</guid>
		<description>I started using Mint about a month ago.  One thing I didn&#039;t like about it was...when you go in depth, there&#039;s no way to go back one level.  Like you start out at the top level of your report, go deeper and deeper, and there&#039;s no back button.  If you press back on your browser it restarts the thing.  Kinda annoying.

Also the report is delayed.  So it&#039;s not an instant update.

However it&#039;s the only online site I use for managing my finances...well not managing but simply over looking.   I think it&#039;s really good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I started using Mint about a month ago.  One thing I didn&#8217;t like about it was&#8230;when you go in depth, there&#8217;s no way to go back one level.  Like you start out at the top level of your report, go deeper and deeper, and there&#8217;s no back button.  If you press back on your browser it restarts the thing.  Kinda annoying.</p>
<p>Also the report is delayed.  So it&#8217;s not an instant update.</p>
<p>However it&#8217;s the only online site I use for managing my finances&#8230;well not managing but simply over looking.   I think it&#8217;s really good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.569 seconds -->
