http://regulargeek.com/2009/08/07/yet-another-call-for-a-federated-twitter/ Where programming, the internet and social media collide. Mon, 21 May 2012 05:30:59 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 http://regulargeek.com/2009/08/07/yet-another-call-for-a-federated-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-3021 What is Next for Social Media ? « MichaelKokkinos Thu, 15 Oct 2009 11:12:07 +0000 http://regulargeek.com/?p=853#comment-3021 [...] for monolithic platforms. There have been many calls for a federated or distributed Twitter, and I have written one myself.  The idea behind this is to have Twitter become infrastructure behind many applications. This [...] [...] for monolithic platforms. There have been many calls for a federated or distributed Twitter, and I have written one myself.  The idea behind this is to have Twitter become infrastructure behind many applications. This [...]

]]> http://regulargeek.com/2009/08/07/yet-another-call-for-a-federated-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-3009 What Is Next For Social Media? | Regular Geek Mon, 12 Oct 2009 16:51:14 +0000 http://regulargeek.com/?p=853#comment-3009 [...] for monolithic platforms. There have been many calls for a federated or distributed Twitter, and I have written one myself.  The idea behind this is to have Twitter become infrastructure behind many applications. This [...] [...] for monolithic platforms. There have been many calls for a federated or distributed Twitter, and I have written one myself.  The idea behind this is to have Twitter become infrastructure behind many applications. This [...]

]]> http://regulargeek.com/2009/08/07/yet-another-call-for-a-federated-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-2970 Finally, Twitter Gives Us User Lists! | Regular Geek Thu, 01 Oct 2009 01:04:33 +0000 http://regulargeek.com/?p=853#comment-2970 [...] implemented, what is the next thing Twitter needs to add? Personally, I would like to see a more federated or distributed Twitter so that it could become the plumbing everyone desires. What would you like to see next? Share [...] [...] implemented, what is the next thing Twitter needs to add? Personally, I would like to see a more federated or distributed Twitter so that it could become the plumbing everyone desires. What would you like to see next? Share [...]

]]> http://regulargeek.com/2009/08/07/yet-another-call-for-a-federated-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-2870 Il punto sul microblogging dopo la pausa estiva - Microblogging.it Mon, 14 Sep 2009 06:59:00 +0000 http://regulargeek.com/?p=853#comment-2870 [...] Yet Another Call For A Federated Twitter [...] [...] Yet Another Call For A Federated Twitter [...]

]]> http://regulargeek.com/2009/08/07/yet-another-call-for-a-federated-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-2871 Il punto sul microblogging dopo la pausa estiva - Microblogging.it Mon, 14 Sep 2009 06:59:00 +0000 http://regulargeek.com/?p=853#comment-2871 [...] Yet Another Call For A Federated Twitter [...] [...] Yet Another Call For A Federated Twitter [...]

]]> http://regulargeek.com/2009/08/07/yet-another-call-for-a-federated-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-2698 Twitpocalypse: “Open Source Twitter” proposed as antidote to Twitter’s DDOS vulnerability | linkthe.com Wed, 12 Aug 2009 00:26:53 +0000 http://regulargeek.com/?p=853#comment-2698 [...] Yet Another Call For A Federated Twitter (regulargeek.com) [...] [...] Yet Another Call For A Federated Twitter (regulargeek.com) [...]

]]> http://regulargeek.com/2009/08/07/yet-another-call-for-a-federated-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-2680 Free Web Apps Go Down...Everbody Panics Mon, 10 Aug 2009 14:01:15 +0000 http://regulargeek.com/?p=853#comment-2680 [...] Yet Another Call For A Federated Twitter (Regular Geek) [...] [...] Yet Another Call For A Federated Twitter (Regular Geek) [...]

]]> http://regulargeek.com/2009/08/07/yet-another-call-for-a-federated-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-2677 Trading one centralized net for another? | Design Website Easy Sun, 09 Aug 2009 21:20:10 +0000 http://regulargeek.com/?p=853#comment-2677 [...] question came up in response to yesterday’s piece about naming. Since name resolution is inherently [...] [...] question came up in response to yesterday’s piece about naming. Since name resolution is inherently [...]

]]>