<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Usable Discovery The Holy Grail?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://regulargeek.com/2009/05/15/is-usable-discovery-the-holy-grail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/05/15/is-usable-discovery-the-holy-grail/</link>
	<description>Where programming, the internet and social media collide.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 05:30:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Comm Biz &#187; On Being a Human Filter</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/05/15/is-usable-discovery-the-holy-grail/comment-page-1/#comment-2504</link>
		<dc:creator>New Comm Biz &#187; On Being a Human Filter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 00:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=665#comment-2504</guid>
		<description>[...]  Is Usable Discovery The Holy Grail?  (regulargeek.com) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Is Usable Discovery The Holy Grail?  (regulargeek.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Streamy Adds More Features! &#124; MyPhillyNetwork</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/05/15/is-usable-discovery-the-holy-grail/comment-page-1/#comment-2305</link>
		<dc:creator>Streamy Adds More Features! &#124; MyPhillyNetwork</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 13:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=665#comment-2305</guid>
		<description>[...]  Is Usable Discovery The Holy Grail?  (regulargeek.com)   Hello there! If you are new here, you might want to subscribe FREE to the RSS feed for updates on this topic.Powered by WP Greet Box   submit_url = &quot;http://myphillynetwork.com/2009/05/21/streamy-adds-more-features/&quot;; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Is Usable Discovery The Holy Grail?  (regulargeek.com)   Hello there! If you are new here, you might want to subscribe FREE to the RSS feed for updates on this topic.Powered by WP Greet Box   submit_url = &#8220;http://myphillynetwork.com/2009/05/21/streamy-adds-more-features/&#8221;; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eight reasons I love FriendFeed &#124; TechWag</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/05/15/is-usable-discovery-the-holy-grail/comment-page-1/#comment-2288</link>
		<dc:creator>Eight reasons I love FriendFeed &#124; TechWag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 23:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=665#comment-2288</guid>
		<description>[...]  Is Usable Discovery The Holy Grail?  (regulargeek.com)      Filed under: Participation, award, fun, web 2.0 Tags: Facebook, FriendFeed, MySpace, Social network, Social network service, Twitter, Washington Post [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Is Usable Discovery The Holy Grail?  (regulargeek.com)      Filed under: Participation, award, fun, web 2.0 Tags: Facebook, FriendFeed, MySpace, Social network, Social network service, Twitter, Washington Post [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robdiana</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/05/15/is-usable-discovery-the-holy-grail/comment-page-1/#comment-2287</link>
		<dc:creator>robdiana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 20:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=665#comment-2287</guid>
		<description>Bryant

I loved your overview of the Netflix prize competition. Napolean Dynamite is a great example of how recommender systems &quot;get confused&quot;. One day I may try something for the netflix prize, but it takes time, and I don&#039;t have much of that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bryant</p>
<p>I loved your overview of the Netflix prize competition. Napolean Dynamite is a great example of how recommender systems &#8220;get confused&#8221;. One day I may try something for the netflix prize, but it takes time, and I don&#8217;t have much of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryant</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/05/15/is-usable-discovery-the-holy-grail/comment-page-1/#comment-2286</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 20:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=665#comment-2286</guid>
		<description>@Daniel True. Netflix is pushing the boundaries of recommendation systems. Read my blog on the topic: http://bryantjoseph.info/Article/the-netflix-prize</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Daniel True. Netflix is pushing the boundaries of recommendation systems. Read my blog on the topic: <a href="http://bryantjoseph.info/Article/the-netflix-prize" rel="nofollow">http://bryantjoseph.info/Article/the-netflix-prize</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robdiana</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/05/15/is-usable-discovery-the-holy-grail/comment-page-1/#comment-2285</link>
		<dc:creator>robdiana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 18:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=665#comment-2285</guid>
		<description>Daniel

Netflix is really a pioneer in the recommendation arena. They have their competition to improve their algorithm which has received a lot of attention. I am not sure how I forgot about them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel</p>
<p>Netflix is really a pioneer in the recommendation arena. They have their competition to improve their algorithm which has received a lot of attention. I am not sure how I forgot about them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Porcher</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/05/15/is-usable-discovery-the-holy-grail/comment-page-1/#comment-2283</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Porcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 15:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=665#comment-2283</guid>
		<description>That should have read &quot;gone down the branch&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That should have read &#8220;gone down the branch&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Porcher</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/05/15/is-usable-discovery-the-holy-grail/comment-page-1/#comment-2282</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Porcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 15:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=665#comment-2282</guid>
		<description>I love the idea of serendipitous search.  To some degree you can see how that might work at a site like the NY Times. I am often pulled to other articles by the 10 most e-mail/blogged box.

I haven&#039;t looked at Amazon recommendations recently so I don&#039;t know if the format has changed, but it strikes me that one of the problems with their recommendation feature was one of categorization.  Novels were interwoven with children&#039;s books and web design books.  It would have been far more useful if I can have gone done the branch I was interested in (or even suppressed a whole category).

NetFlix has had far better results with its recommendation system at least as far as I am concerned.  It had the feature of showing people with similar lists with you and giving the percentage of overlap. You could then go look at that person&#039;s list and see what else they had on the list that might be of interest.

I think the one limitation of Netflix&#039;s viewer matching system was a failure to weight it in any way. My guess would be that the fact that I shared an interest with the someone in a highly popular film like &quot;Star Wars&quot; or &quot;Big&quot; is of less significance than the fact that we shared an interest in an unusual film like &quot;Saragosso Manuscript&quot; or &quot;The Visitor&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the idea of serendipitous search.  To some degree you can see how that might work at a site like the NY Times. I am often pulled to other articles by the 10 most e-mail/blogged box.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t looked at Amazon recommendations recently so I don&#8217;t know if the format has changed, but it strikes me that one of the problems with their recommendation feature was one of categorization.  Novels were interwoven with children&#8217;s books and web design books.  It would have been far more useful if I can have gone done the branch I was interested in (or even suppressed a whole category).</p>
<p>NetFlix has had far better results with its recommendation system at least as far as I am concerned.  It had the feature of showing people with similar lists with you and giving the percentage of overlap. You could then go look at that person&#8217;s list and see what else they had on the list that might be of interest.</p>
<p>I think the one limitation of Netflix&#8217;s viewer matching system was a failure to weight it in any way. My guess would be that the fact that I shared an interest with the someone in a highly popular film like &#8220;Star Wars&#8221; or &#8220;Big&#8221; is of less significance than the fact that we shared an interest in an unusual film like &#8220;Saragosso Manuscript&#8221; or &#8220;The Visitor&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.472 seconds -->

