Comments on: Talk With Me, Not At Me http://regulargeek.com/2009/05/08/talk-with-me-not-at-me/ Where programming, the internet and social media collide. Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:33:13 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: New Comm Biz » What I’m doing to fight the social media echo chamber http://regulargeek.com/2009/05/08/talk-with-me-not-at-me/comment-page-1/#comment-2505 New Comm Biz » What I’m doing to fight the social media echo chamber Mon, 06 Jul 2009 00:11:57 +0000 http://regulargeek.com/?p=654#comment-2505 [...] Talk With Me, Not At Me (regulargeek.com) [...] [...] Talk With Me, Not At Me (regulargeek.com) [...]

]]> By: Social Media For What? | jmarbach.com http://regulargeek.com/2009/05/08/talk-with-me-not-at-me/comment-page-1/#comment-2292 Social Media For What? | jmarbach.com Mon, 18 May 2009 00:29:50 +0000 http://regulargeek.com/?p=654#comment-2292 [...] For talking with your customers. [...] [...] For talking with your customers. [...]

]]> By: What if? by Adam Singer « TevisVerrett.com http://regulargeek.com/2009/05/08/talk-with-me-not-at-me/comment-page-1/#comment-2284 What if? by Adam Singer « TevisVerrett.com Fri, 15 May 2009 17:55:47 +0000 http://regulargeek.com/?p=654#comment-2284 [...] talked with your customers, not at [...] [...] talked with your customers, not at [...]

]]> By: What If? http://regulargeek.com/2009/05/08/talk-with-me-not-at-me/comment-page-1/#comment-2274 What If? Fri, 15 May 2009 10:13:20 +0000 http://regulargeek.com/?p=654#comment-2274 [...] talked with your customers, not at [...] [...] talked with your customers, not at [...]

]]> By: robdiana http://regulargeek.com/2009/05/08/talk-with-me-not-at-me/comment-page-1/#comment-2241 robdiana Sun, 10 May 2009 11:28:50 +0000 http://regulargeek.com/?p=654#comment-2241 Mike, I guess my question really becomes, if you are writing a blog or on Twitter why not respond to comments? Why are you there in the first place? Mike,

I guess my question really becomes, if you are writing a blog or on Twitter why not respond to comments? Why are you there in the first place?

]]> By: Mike Driehorst http://regulargeek.com/2009/05/08/talk-with-me-not-at-me/comment-page-1/#comment-2240 Mike Driehorst Sun, 10 May 2009 02:37:13 +0000 http://regulargeek.com/?p=654#comment-2240 Like with blogs, it's up to the individual -- either a real individual or the individual(s) behind a corp Twitter account -- to reply and spur conversations. There's nothing that can be done to Twitter. It lies with the person behind the Twitter account and if he/she replies and retweets. -Mike (By the way, I found my way here via @scottradcliff on Twitter.) Like with blogs, it’s up to the individual — either a real individual or the individual(s) behind a corp Twitter account — to reply and spur conversations.

There’s nothing that can be done to Twitter. It lies with the person behind the Twitter account and if he/she replies and retweets.

-Mike
(By the way, I found my way here via @scottradcliff on Twitter.)

]]> By: robdiana http://regulargeek.com/2009/05/08/talk-with-me-not-at-me/comment-page-1/#comment-2234 robdiana Fri, 08 May 2009 15:26:46 +0000 http://regulargeek.com/?p=654#comment-2234 Gavin, I should have been clearer, I was just saying that Seth, Fred and a handful of others are the "best bloggers" in their categories and are "allowed" to broadcast. Fred answers a ton of his comments, mine included. Gavin,

I should have been clearer, I was just saying that Seth, Fred and a handful of others are the “best bloggers” in their categories and are “allowed” to broadcast. Fred answers a ton of his comments, mine included.

]]> By: Gavin Schulz http://regulargeek.com/2009/05/08/talk-with-me-not-at-me/comment-page-1/#comment-2233 Gavin Schulz Fri, 08 May 2009 15:15:58 +0000 http://regulargeek.com/?p=654#comment-2233 Fred Wilson isn't a broadcaster. He's one of the most engaged bloggers I know. Fred Wilson isn’t a broadcaster. He’s one of the most engaged bloggers I know.

]]>