<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook Teasing Us With Open</title>
	<atom:link href="http://regulargeek.com/2009/04/28/facebook-teasing-us-with-open/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/04/28/facebook-teasing-us-with-open/</link>
	<description>Where programming, the internet and social media collide.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:33:13 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pages tagged "teasing"</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/04/28/facebook-teasing-us-with-open/comment-page-1/#comment-2210</link>
		<dc:creator>Pages tagged "teasing"</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 20:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=618#comment-2210</guid>
		<description>[...] bookmarks tagged teasing Facebook Teasing Us With Open &#124; Regular Geek&#160;saved by 2 others  &#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;JimLovesFirefly bookmarked on 05/05/09 &#124; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bookmarks tagged teasing Facebook Teasing Us With Open | Regular Geek&nbsp;saved by 2 others  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;JimLovesFirefly bookmarked on 05/05/09 | [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tech Week In Review: Facebook API and Desktop, Swine Flu, 4Chan, and Phishing&#160;&#124;&#160;Black Web 2.0</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/04/28/facebook-teasing-us-with-open/comment-page-1/#comment-2205</link>
		<dc:creator>Tech Week In Review: Facebook API and Desktop, Swine Flu, 4Chan, and Phishing&#160;&#124;&#160;Black Web 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 21:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=618#comment-2205</guid>
		<description>[...] there is that Facebook isn&#8217;t as open as we first thought. It&#8217;s so-called open API is just a tease, nowhere near as useful as what Twitter, FriendFeed and many other services have to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] there is that Facebook isn&#8217;t as open as we first thought. It&#8217;s so-called open API is just a tease, nowhere near as useful as what Twitter, FriendFeed and many other services have to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robdiana</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/04/28/facebook-teasing-us-with-open/comment-page-1/#comment-2196</link>
		<dc:creator>robdiana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=618#comment-2196</guid>
		<description>Adam,

I totally agree that Facebook is not being creative at all. It could be that they are being very conservative due to the &quot;beacon debacle&quot;, and do not want to risk much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam,</p>
<p>I totally agree that Facebook is not being creative at all. It could be that they are being very conservative due to the &#8220;beacon debacle&#8221;, and do not want to risk much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Singer</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/04/28/facebook-teasing-us-with-open/comment-page-1/#comment-2195</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Singer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=618#comment-2195</guid>
		<description>Search is certainly where the money is at, however Facebook should be getting more creative with monetization than they are.  They need to mix it up and try little experiments every day.  So much traffic and interactions, no reason not to be doing this.  Instead they just serve ads that aren&#039;t even relevant to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Search is certainly where the money is at, however Facebook should be getting more creative with monetization than they are.  They need to mix it up and try little experiments every day.  So much traffic and interactions, no reason not to be doing this.  Instead they just serve ads that aren&#8217;t even relevant to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.540 seconds -->
