<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter Biting The Hand That Feeds It</title>
	<atom:link href="http://regulargeek.com/2009/04/22/twitter-biting-the-hand-that-feeds-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/04/22/twitter-biting-the-hand-that-feeds-it/</link>
	<description>Where programming, the internet and social media collide.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:50:10 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Twitter Trackbacks for Twitter Biting The Hand That Feeds It &#124; Regular Geek [regulargeek.com] on Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/04/22/twitter-biting-the-hand-that-feeds-it/comment-page-1/#comment-2824</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter Trackbacks for Twitter Biting The Hand That Feeds It &#124; Regular Geek [regulargeek.com] on Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 00:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=72#comment-2824</guid>
		<description>[...] Twitter Biting The Hand That Feeds It &#124; Regular Geek  regulargeek.com/2009/04/22/twitter-biting-the-hand-that-feeds-it &#8211; view page &#8211; cached  Twitter has obviously decided that the people who made their service popular are not that important to them. For quite some time, Twitter seemed to be catering to developers with a fairly good API that many used to build third party clients. However, they have continued to limit what the developers can do, with the latest incident being the daily follower limit. &#8212; From the page [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Twitter Biting The Hand That Feeds It | Regular Geek  regulargeek.com/2009/04/22/twitter-biting-the-hand-that-feeds-it &ndash; view page &ndash; cached  Twitter has obviously decided that the people who made their service popular are not that important to them. For quite some time, Twitter seemed to be catering to developers with a fairly good API that many used to build third party clients. However, they have continued to limit what the developers can do, with the latest incident being the daily follower limit. &mdash; From the page [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Matas</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/04/22/twitter-biting-the-hand-that-feeds-it/comment-page-1/#comment-2177</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Matas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 17:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=72#comment-2177</guid>
		<description>Posted on Social Median:

Part of the thrill of Twitter right now is its mega growth with media hype and celebrity action. But it is still figuring itself out with limited employees. 

So simple customer service questions take months to answer...relationships suffer...while we wait for Google to buy or Twitter to monetize. And for someone to care about the users and partners. Customer Service and Partner Relations grades: F- and F.

No love from Twitter right now -- but check them out on Oprah! http://www.oprah.com/article/oprahshow/20090417-tows-ashton-kutcher-twitter/6</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Posted on Social Median:</p>
<p>Part of the thrill of Twitter right now is its mega growth with media hype and celebrity action. But it is still figuring itself out with limited employees. </p>
<p>So simple customer service questions take months to answer&#8230;relationships suffer&#8230;while we wait for Google to buy or Twitter to monetize. And for someone to care about the users and partners. Customer Service and Partner Relations grades: F- and F.</p>
<p>No love from Twitter right now &#8212; but check them out on Oprah! <a href="http://www.oprah.com/article/oprahshow/20090417-tows-ashton-kutcher-twitter/6" rel="nofollow">http://www.oprah.com/article/o.....-twitter/6</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: @hallublin RE: regulargeek.com part of the problem is devs trying to turn Twitter into an electronic version of direct mail - Twitoaster</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/04/22/twitter-biting-the-hand-that-feeds-it/comment-page-1/#comment-2174</link>
		<dc:creator>@hallublin RE: regulargeek.com part of the problem is devs trying to turn Twitter into an electronic version of direct mail - Twitoaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 15:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=72#comment-2174</guid>
		<description>[...] minutes ago @hallublin RE: http://regulargeek.com/2009/04/22/twitte... part of the problem is devs trying to turn Twitter into an electronic version of direct mail.   [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] minutes ago @hallublin RE: <a href="http://regulargeek.com/2009/04/22/twitte.." rel="nofollow">http://regulargeek.com/2009/04/22/twitte..</a>. part of the problem is devs trying to turn Twitter into an electronic version of direct mail.   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robdiana</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/04/22/twitter-biting-the-hand-that-feeds-it/comment-page-1/#comment-2172</link>
		<dc:creator>robdiana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=72#comment-2172</guid>
		<description>Matt

Generally, I agree that building a business on top of another service is risky. However, having an API open for so long made them somewhat dependent on third party developers for their popularity. It is more of a shame that all of these interesting services that have been built may get shut down due to the various restrictions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt</p>
<p>Generally, I agree that building a business on top of another service is risky. However, having an API open for so long made them somewhat dependent on third party developers for their popularity. It is more of a shame that all of these interesting services that have been built may get shut down due to the various restrictions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robdiana</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/04/22/twitter-biting-the-hand-that-feeds-it/comment-page-1/#comment-2171</link>
		<dc:creator>robdiana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=72#comment-2171</guid>
		<description>Nicholas,

The interesting part is that Facebook has been slowly opening up more. Twitter seems to be going in the opposite direction some days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicholas,</p>
<p>The interesting part is that Facebook has been slowly opening up more. Twitter seems to be going in the opposite direction some days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/04/22/twitter-biting-the-hand-that-feeds-it/comment-page-1/#comment-2170</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=72#comment-2170</guid>
		<description>The daily follower limit has two possible reasons for being implemented. 1) Server load. Do you want to see the fail whale all day? 2) Spam control. The more likely reason. 

I have a hard time feeling sorry for the developers being limited in what they can do. That is one of the risks you take when you try to piggy back your business on someone else&#039;s. If you want to have full control, start your own Twitter like service. It&#039;s their business, they can do what they want IMO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The daily follower limit has two possible reasons for being implemented. 1) Server load. Do you want to see the fail whale all day? 2) Spam control. The more likely reason. </p>
<p>I have a hard time feeling sorry for the developers being limited in what they can do. That is one of the risks you take when you try to piggy back your business on someone else&#8217;s. If you want to have full control, start your own Twitter like service. It&#8217;s their business, they can do what they want IMO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/04/22/twitter-biting-the-hand-that-feeds-it/comment-page-1/#comment-2169</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=72#comment-2169</guid>
		<description>as a developer I have seen Twitter becoming more non-responsive to their core user base in favor of so-called celebrities. sure, they&#039;re trying to make money now but FaceBook makes insane amounts of cash hand over fist without screwing with their users (too much) lol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as a developer I have seen Twitter becoming more non-responsive to their core user base in favor of so-called celebrities. sure, they&#8217;re trying to make money now but FaceBook makes insane amounts of cash hand over fist without screwing with their users (too much) lol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 布里斯班</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/04/22/twitter-biting-the-hand-that-feeds-it/comment-page-1/#comment-2165</link>
		<dc:creator>布里斯班</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=72#comment-2165</guid>
		<description>Only twitter is enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only twitter is enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.515 seconds -->
