<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If Twitter Is For Sale, Who Should By It?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://regulargeek.com/2009/04/03/if-twitter-is-for-sale-who-should-by-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/04/03/if-twitter-is-for-sale-who-should-by-it/</link>
	<description>Where programming, the internet and social media collide.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 23:37:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter Suitors Revisited &#124; Regular Geek</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/04/03/if-twitter-is-for-sale-who-should-by-it/comment-page-1/#comment-2213</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter Suitors Revisited &#124; Regular Geek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 12:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=551#comment-2213</guid>
		<description>[...] who else can buy Twitter and why would it be a good idea? I wrote a post a month ago about this, so I am going to try to explain my thinking more this time. First, let&#8217;s assume the winning [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] who else can buy Twitter and why would it be a good idea? I wrote a post a month ago about this, so I am going to try to explain my thinking more this time. First, let&#8217;s assume the winning [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: If Twitter Is For Sale, Who Should By It? &#124; Real Rumors</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/04/03/if-twitter-is-for-sale-who-should-by-it/comment-page-1/#comment-2055</link>
		<dc:creator>If Twitter Is For Sale, Who Should By It? &#124; Real Rumors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 16:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=551#comment-2055</guid>
		<description>[...] If Twitter Is For Sale, Who Should By It? 03.04.2009 &#124; Posted in Industry    The internet is alive with rumors that Google is in talks to acquire Twitter . This is not overly surprising as Google tends to make a run at many hot properties. The concern with this is that Google does not have a great record of integrating new purchases and having them flourish. They already bought and released the Jaiku microblogging site, so there should be some concern over what would happen with Twitter. UPDATE: Kara Swisher has debunked the rumor in her post this morning . Howev Here is the original post: If Twitter Is For Sale, Who Should By It? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If Twitter Is For Sale, Who Should By It? 03.04.2009 | Posted in Industry    The internet is alive with rumors that Google is in talks to acquire Twitter . This is not overly surprising as Google tends to make a run at many hot properties. The concern with this is that Google does not have a great record of integrating new purchases and having them flourish. They already bought and released the Jaiku microblogging site, so there should be some concern over what would happen with Twitter. UPDATE: Kara Swisher has debunked the rumor in her post this morning . Howev Here is the original post: If Twitter Is For Sale, Who Should By It? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.405 seconds -->

