<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Twitter Testing New Designs?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://regulargeek.com/2009/04/01/is-twitter-testing-new-designs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/04/01/is-twitter-testing-new-designs/</link>
	<description>Where programming, the internet and social media collide.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 05:30:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter Trackbacks for Is Twitter Testing New Designs? &#124; Regular Geek [regulargeek.com] on Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/04/01/is-twitter-testing-new-designs/comment-page-1/#comment-2813</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter Trackbacks for Is Twitter Testing New Designs? &#124; Regular Geek [regulargeek.com] on Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 11:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=539#comment-2813</guid>
		<description>[...] Is Twitter Testing New Designs? &#124; Regular Geek  regulargeek.com/2009/04/01/is-twitter-testing-new-designs &#8211; view page &#8211; cached  This morning I noticed that my Twitter home page looked a little different. If you look closely you will notice several differences. The old version has been around for quite some time, and Twitter has been in need of some upgrades. However, are these design tweaks worthwhile? &#8212; From the page [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Is Twitter Testing New Designs? | Regular Geek  regulargeek.com/2009/04/01/is-twitter-testing-new-designs &ndash; view page &ndash; cached  This morning I noticed that my Twitter home page looked a little different. If you look closely you will notice several differences. The old version has been around for quite some time, and Twitter has been in need of some upgrades. However, are these design tweaks worthwhile? &mdash; From the page [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robdiana</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/04/01/is-twitter-testing-new-designs/comment-page-1/#comment-2046</link>
		<dc:creator>robdiana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 17:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=539#comment-2046</guid>
		<description>Atul,

I did notice that after I wrote this post. I have a feeling that something bigger is coming, and this is just a precursor to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Atul,</p>
<p>I did notice that after I wrote this post. I have a feeling that something bigger is coming, and this is just a precursor to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Atul</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/04/01/is-twitter-testing-new-designs/comment-page-1/#comment-2045</link>
		<dc:creator>Atul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 17:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=539#comment-2045</guid>
		<description>They also changed the URL to http://twitter.com/timeline/home from http://twitter.com/home. Not clear why they did that as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They also changed the URL to <a href="http://twitter.com/timeline/home" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/timeline/home</a> from <a href="http://twitter.com/home" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/home</a>. Not clear why they did that as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robdiana</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/04/01/is-twitter-testing-new-designs/comment-page-1/#comment-2044</link>
		<dc:creator>robdiana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 15:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=539#comment-2044</guid>
		<description>TLR

I am not asking for huge amounts of functionality. But simple things like groups or personal lists would be nice. They just reworked the replies to be &quot;mentions&quot; in the past week, but it had been a feature of many of the desktop apps for ages. Design is something that can have simple changes with &quot;big&quot; results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TLR</p>
<p>I am not asking for huge amounts of functionality. But simple things like groups or personal lists would be nice. They just reworked the replies to be &#8220;mentions&#8221; in the past week, but it had been a feature of many of the desktop apps for ages. Design is something that can have simple changes with &#8220;big&#8221; results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Lovable Rogue</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/04/01/is-twitter-testing-new-designs/comment-page-1/#comment-2043</link>
		<dc:creator>The Lovable Rogue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 15:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=539#comment-2043</guid>
		<description>hey there,
To be honest, I&#039;ve been somewhat absent from Twitter over the past few months, so I hadn&#039;t actually noticed these changes.  You suggest that theys are somewhat simplistic, but then isn&#039;t that the beauty of the platform? Granted, some further functionality would be fantastic, but I have always been reasonably pleased with Twitter as a platform.  All too often, sites continue to develop their tools, overly complicatin manyg a service that is inherently simple.  I think it would be a shame if Twitter compromised its simplicity in pursuit of functionality.

TLR</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey there,<br />
To be honest, I&#8217;ve been somewhat absent from Twitter over the past few months, so I hadn&#8217;t actually noticed these changes.  You suggest that theys are somewhat simplistic, but then isn&#8217;t that the beauty of the platform? Granted, some further functionality would be fantastic, but I have always been reasonably pleased with Twitter as a platform.  All too often, sites continue to develop their tools, overly complicatin manyg a service that is inherently simple.  I think it would be a shame if Twitter compromised its simplicity in pursuit of functionality.</p>
<p>TLR</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.399 seconds -->

