<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The State Of Social News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://regulargeek.com/2009/03/21/the-state-of-social-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/03/21/the-state-of-social-news/</link>
	<description>Where programming, the internet and social media collide.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 05:30:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/03/21/the-state-of-social-news/comment-page-1/#comment-2421</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 18:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=506#comment-2421</guid>
		<description>&quot;Digg saw a 51% increase in the past year.&quot;

That&#039;s a huge increase. I wonder what was the driving factor behind this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Digg saw a 51% increase in the past year.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a huge increase. I wonder what was the driving factor behind this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/03/21/the-state-of-social-news/comment-page-1/#comment-2060</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 05:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=506#comment-2060</guid>
		<description>According to Alexa, 27% of mixx traffic comes from India (compared to 21% for the US.) There is a significant amount of bollywood spam on mixx, so I wonder how much of that 27% is spammers, and how much is real people. 

Mixx is still my favorite site, and I think it will continue to grow in popularity, but they&#039;re going to have to figure out a way to kill the spam problem if they&#039;re going to go as mainstream as they hope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Alexa, 27% of mixx traffic comes from India (compared to 21% for the US.) There is a significant amount of bollywood spam on mixx, so I wonder how much of that 27% is spammers, and how much is real people. </p>
<p>Mixx is still my favorite site, and I think it will continue to grow in popularity, but they&#8217;re going to have to figure out a way to kill the spam problem if they&#8217;re going to go as mainstream as they hope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robdiana</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/03/21/the-state-of-social-news/comment-page-1/#comment-1949</link>
		<dc:creator>robdiana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 13:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=506#comment-1949</guid>
		<description>Michael,

I did not include socialmedian as I see them distinctly different than social news sites. I find them to be more of a customized personal news site. They are growing nicely, with quantcast showing almost 100% growth over the past 3 months. I am curious to see what they do as well since the Xing purchase.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael,</p>
<p>I did not include socialmedian as I see them distinctly different than social news sites. I find them to be more of a customized personal news site. They are growing nicely, with quantcast showing almost 100% growth over the past 3 months. I am curious to see what they do as well since the Xing purchase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Fidler</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/03/21/the-state-of-social-news/comment-page-1/#comment-1948</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Fidler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 13:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=506#comment-1948</guid>
		<description>I like how you went out of your way to make sure this was a fair analysis. In your research, did you ever look at socialmedian&#039;s numbers? It seems like they&#039;re growing at a nice clip. I know they&#039;re much smaller than the others, but I&#039;m curious to find out if you found anything. Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like how you went out of your way to make sure this was a fair analysis. In your research, did you ever look at socialmedian&#8217;s numbers? It seems like they&#8217;re growing at a nice clip. I know they&#8217;re much smaller than the others, but I&#8217;m curious to find out if you found anything. Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.387 seconds -->

