<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Status Updates Are Not Conversation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://regulargeek.com/2009/01/25/status-updates-are-not-conversation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/01/25/status-updates-are-not-conversation/</link>
	<description>Where programming, the internet and social media collide.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 05:30:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Comm Biz &#187; What is a conversation anyway?</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/01/25/status-updates-are-not-conversation/comment-page-1/#comment-2502</link>
		<dc:creator>New Comm Biz &#187; What is a conversation anyway?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 23:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=407#comment-2502</guid>
		<description>[...] favorite Philly area tech blogger, Regular Geek, has an interesting post on Twitter and Facebook. Status Updates Are Not Conversation &#124; Regular Geek Robert was admittedly cranky when he wrote the post and I attribute this to the fact that I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] favorite Philly area tech blogger, Regular Geek, has an interesting post on Twitter and Facebook. Status Updates Are Not Conversation | Regular Geek Robert was admittedly cranky when he wrote the post and I attribute this to the fact that I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The 25 Things Meme Is Not News</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/01/25/status-updates-are-not-conversation/comment-page-1/#comment-1641</link>
		<dc:creator>The 25 Things Meme Is Not News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 19:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=407#comment-1641</guid>
		<description>[...] Status Updates Are Not Conversation (Regular Geek) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Status Updates Are Not Conversation (Regular Geek) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Status Updates Are Not Conversation &#124; ShaBlogs</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/01/25/status-updates-are-not-conversation/comment-page-1/#comment-1616</link>
		<dc:creator>Status Updates Are Not Conversation &#124; ShaBlogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 13:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=407#comment-1616</guid>
		<description>[...] Go here to see the original:  Status Updates Are Not Conversation [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Go here to see the original:  Status Updates Are Not Conversation [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Are We Missing Something By Reading An RSS Feed? &#124; Guilda Blog</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/01/25/status-updates-are-not-conversation/comment-page-1/#comment-1594</link>
		<dc:creator>Are We Missing Something By Reading An RSS Feed? &#124; Guilda Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 22:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=407#comment-1594</guid>
		<description>[...] that read this blog regularly know that I am a big proponent of the conversation. I blog about what conversation may or may not be. I have written a tool to let you track where in social media people are talking about your blog [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that read this blog regularly know that I am a big proponent of the conversation. I blog about what conversation may or may not be. I have written a tool to let you track where in social media people are talking about your blog [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/01/25/status-updates-are-not-conversation/comment-page-1/#comment-1585</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=407#comment-1585</guid>
		<description>Astute points. I think people are just looking for ways to use all these tools seamlessly. It&#039;s natural to want to consolidate our efforts. But the fact remains, FB status updates and microblogs are hardly the same thing...and treating them identically usually just pisses people off :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Astute points. I think people are just looking for ways to use all these tools seamlessly. It&#8217;s natural to want to consolidate our efforts. But the fact remains, FB status updates and microblogs are hardly the same thing&#8230;and treating them identically usually just pisses people off <img src='http://regulargeek.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robdiana</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/01/25/status-updates-are-not-conversation/comment-page-1/#comment-1571</link>
		<dc:creator>robdiana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=407#comment-1571</guid>
		<description>@esd714 - the differentiation may actually go away if microblogging becomes more standardized.

@cwylie0 - moving the conversation to IM/email is a great idea that is still untapped. Why not have an &quot;email this user&quot; option on Twitter/Facebook/FriendFeed? DM or private messaging tends to be yet another place to find messages, and email works very well.

@NerdStalker - &quot;out of context&quot; replies are a deal killer. Disappointingly, FriendFeed only adds to the problem with the &quot;reply in Twitter&quot; feature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@esd714 &#8211; the differentiation may actually go away if microblogging becomes more standardized.</p>
<p>@cwylie0 &#8211; moving the conversation to IM/email is a great idea that is still untapped. Why not have an &#8220;email this user&#8221; option on Twitter/Facebook/FriendFeed? DM or private messaging tends to be yet another place to find messages, and email works very well.</p>
<p>@NerdStalker &#8211; &#8220;out of context&#8221; replies are a deal killer. Disappointingly, FriendFeed only adds to the problem with the &#8220;reply in Twitter&#8221; feature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nerd Stalker</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/01/25/status-updates-are-not-conversation/comment-page-1/#comment-1570</link>
		<dc:creator>Nerd Stalker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=407#comment-1570</guid>
		<description>The worst part about this is seeing a flood of @ replys out of context out in the wild, for instance friendfeed. I guarantee that&#039;s a great way to get unfollowed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The worst part about this is seeing a flood of @ replys out of context out in the wild, for instance friendfeed. I guarantee that&#8217;s a great way to get unfollowed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goodness Gracious, Great Blogs of Fire! &#187; The Buzz Bin</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2009/01/25/status-updates-are-not-conversation/comment-page-1/#comment-1569</link>
		<dc:creator>Goodness Gracious, Great Blogs of Fire! &#187; The Buzz Bin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=407#comment-1569</guid>
		<description>[...] additional funding round. After comparing Twitter’s position with that of Facebook, Rob says, “If Twitter gets an offer from Facebook, I would recommend they take it. Otherwise, Facebook may wake...” What are your thoughts on a Twitter revenue model? Will Twitter become mainstream like Facebook? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] additional funding round. After comparing Twitter’s position with that of Facebook, Rob says, “If Twitter gets an offer from Facebook, I would recommend they take it. Otherwise, Facebook may wake&#8230;” What are your thoughts on a Twitter revenue model? Will Twitter become mainstream like Facebook? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.445 seconds -->

