<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Should Buy StumbleUpon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://regulargeek.com/2008/10/24/google-should-buy-stumbleupon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://regulargeek.com/2008/10/24/google-should-buy-stumbleupon/</link>
	<description>Where programming, the internet and social media collide.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 16:52:44 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter Trackbacks for Google Should Buy StumbleUpon - Regular Geek [regulargeek.com] on Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2008/10/24/google-should-buy-stumbleupon/comment-page-1/#comment-2817</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter Trackbacks for Google Should Buy StumbleUpon - Regular Geek [regulargeek.com] on Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 10:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=144#comment-2817</guid>
		<description>[...] Google Should Buy StumbleUpon - Regular Geek  regulargeek.com/2008/10/24/google-should-buy-stumbleupon &#8211; view page &#8211; cached  If a Digg and StumbleUpon merger does not make sense, then who else is likely? Enter Google. Google has the cash to make a $75 million purchase. They have already expressed interest in getting into the social media field with their abandoned Digg acquisition. &#8212; From the page [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google Should Buy StumbleUpon &#8211; Regular Geek  regulargeek.com/2008/10/24/google-should-buy-stumbleupon &ndash; view page &ndash; cached  If a Digg and StumbleUpon merger does not make sense, then who else is likely? Enter Google. Google has the cash to make a $75 million purchase. They have already expressed interest in getting into the social media field with their abandoned Digg acquisition. &mdash; From the page [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RegularGeek 10 Most Talked About Posts - Regular Geek</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2008/10/24/google-should-buy-stumbleupon/comment-page-1/#comment-1349</link>
		<dc:creator>RegularGeek 10 Most Talked About Posts - Regular Geek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 13:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=144#comment-1349</guid>
		<description>[...] (25) Google Should Buy StumbleUpon It has been rumored that StumbleUpon is for sale. In this post, I recommend that Google should [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (25) Google Should Buy StumbleUpon It has been rumored that StumbleUpon is for sale. In this post, I recommend that Google should [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bman87</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2008/10/24/google-should-buy-stumbleupon/comment-page-1/#comment-1253</link>
		<dc:creator>bman87</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 14:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=144#comment-1253</guid>
		<description>Google certainly does have an interest in streamlining acess to ad-integrated content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google certainly does have an interest in streamlining acess to ad-integrated content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Lang</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2008/10/24/google-should-buy-stumbleupon/comment-page-1/#comment-1031</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Lang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 21:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=144#comment-1031</guid>
		<description>@Valeria,

Google Reader already will integrate your social bookmarking friends profiles, just add their RSS feed from their submissions page to Google Reader.

This is how I currently follow all my social friend&#039;s profiles. This is also how most top social bookmarking users do it as well.

What we are waiting for is Google Friend Connect to roll out since it is the glue that will hold the rest together. Until that happens we are just using the pieces, not the whole pie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Valeria,</p>
<p>Google Reader already will integrate your social bookmarking friends profiles, just add their RSS feed from their submissions page to Google Reader.</p>
<p>This is how I currently follow all my social friend&#8217;s profiles. This is also how most top social bookmarking users do it as well.</p>
<p>What we are waiting for is Google Friend Connect to roll out since it is the glue that will hold the rest together. Until that happens we are just using the pieces, not the whole pie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valeria &#124; TimelessLessons</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2008/10/24/google-should-buy-stumbleupon/comment-page-1/#comment-1028</link>
		<dc:creator>Valeria &#124; TimelessLessons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 11:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=144#comment-1028</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure Google has enough funds in their pocket to make a sweep here. StumbleUpon &amp; Google Reader integration sounds great to me and as of late Google is showing a lot of interest in new investments, this could be a really good one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure Google has enough funds in their pocket to make a sweep here. StumbleUpon &amp; Google Reader integration sounds great to me and as of late Google is showing a lot of interest in new investments, this could be a really good one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Should Buy StumbleUpon &#171; World News</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2008/10/24/google-should-buy-stumbleupon/comment-page-1/#comment-1018</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Should Buy StumbleUpon &#171; World News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 10:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=144#comment-1018</guid>
		<description>[...] read more &#124; digg story [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read more | digg story [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Svetlana Gladkova</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2008/10/24/google-should-buy-stumbleupon/comment-page-1/#comment-1012</link>
		<dc:creator>Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 15:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=144#comment-1012</guid>
		<description>Rob, I do hear what you say and I know that Digg is definitely rapidly losing value by making it less and less dependent on the wisdom of crowd. But from my experience StumbleUpon can be manipulated similarly to Digg (and I know many bloggers who engage in such manipulations) so of course to actually rely on any of the resources for human-powered search Google will need to fix the algorithms to reach some totally &quot;ungamable&quot; state which I doubt is possible. But anyway sometimes both offer certain value so this value integrated into search experience could be more valuable than it is when independent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob, I do hear what you say and I know that Digg is definitely rapidly losing value by making it less and less dependent on the wisdom of crowd. But from my experience StumbleUpon can be manipulated similarly to Digg (and I know many bloggers who engage in such manipulations) so of course to actually rely on any of the resources for human-powered search Google will need to fix the algorithms to reach some totally &#8220;ungamable&#8221; state which I doubt is possible. But anyway sometimes both offer certain value so this value integrated into search experience could be more valuable than it is when independent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter Squatting? It's So Yesterday.. &#124; Streamxy - The #1 Blog On How To Start Your Own Blogging Business</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2008/10/24/google-should-buy-stumbleupon/comment-page-1/#comment-1011</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter Squatting? It's So Yesterday.. &#124; Streamxy - The #1 Blog On How To Start Your Own Blogging Business</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 06:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=144#comment-1011</guid>
		<description>[...] Social media had become a big attention lately.  People talk about social media from their ROI, actual value of social media traffic and to the latest business buzz. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Social media had become a big attention lately.  People talk about social media from their ROI, actual value of social media traffic and to the latest business buzz. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.715 seconds -->
