<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yammer? Nothing Else Was Better?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://regulargeek.com/2008/09/11/yammer-nothing-else-was-better/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://regulargeek.com/2008/09/11/yammer-nothing-else-was-better/</link>
	<description>Where programming, the internet and social media collide.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 23:37:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vitaliy Demur</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2008/09/11/yammer-nothing-else-was-better/comment-page-1/#comment-2705</link>
		<dc:creator>Vitaliy Demur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 08:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=115#comment-2705</guid>
		<description>Hello Rob! Nothing you have withdrawn on Yammer...
Yammer is a great product that has ability to improve communications and create transparency by virtually making company’s structure flat. I work for LADevelopers Inc. (http://www.ladevelopers.com) a California based software development firm. We specialize in custom Yammer solutions for enterprise and know this product inside out. Please contact us if you need any help with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Rob! Nothing you have withdrawn on Yammer&#8230;<br />
Yammer is a great product that has ability to improve communications and create transparency by virtually making company’s structure flat. I work for LADevelopers Inc. (<a href="http://www.ladevelopers.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.ladevelopers.com</a>) a California based software development firm. We specialize in custom Yammer solutions for enterprise and know this product inside out. Please contact us if you need any help with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 21st Century Spirituality &#183; Hyperstream of 2008-09-12</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2008/09/11/yammer-nothing-else-was-better/comment-page-1/#comment-875</link>
		<dc:creator>21st Century Spirituality &#183; Hyperstream of 2008-09-12</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 22:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=115#comment-875</guid>
		<description>[...] mushin published a blog post. Rob Diana (friend of Hutch Carpenter): Yammer? Nothing Else Was Better? (via Blog) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] mushin published a blog post. Rob Diana (friend of Hutch Carpenter): Yammer? Nothing Else Was Better? (via Blog) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yammer Gets Bronx Cheers from the Blogosphere. Why? &#171; I&#8217;m Not Actually a Geek</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2008/09/11/yammer-nothing-else-was-better/comment-page-1/#comment-863</link>
		<dc:creator>Yammer Gets Bronx Cheers from the Blogosphere. Why? &#171; I&#8217;m Not Actually a Geek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 14:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=115#comment-863</guid>
		<description>[...] to source posts: Dennis Howlett, Rafe Needleman, Rob Diana, Mathew Ingram, Svetlana Gladkova, Chris Cardinal, Chris Brogan, Jennifer Leggio, Bernard Lunn, Joe [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to source posts: Dennis Howlett, Rafe Needleman, Rob Diana, Mathew Ingram, Svetlana Gladkova, Chris Cardinal, Chris Brogan, Jennifer Leggio, Bernard Lunn, Joe [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Insights From Three Years of Blogging - Regular Geek</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2008/09/11/yammer-nothing-else-was-better/comment-page-1/#comment-862</link>
		<dc:creator>Insights From Three Years of Blogging - Regular Geek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 10:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=115#comment-862</guid>
		<description>[...] The last thing I wanted to talk about is social skills and networking. I am, for the most part, an introvert, but thankfully the Internet gives me a way to hide from the world, and put my best foot forward in making new connections and networking with people that I might not have had the ability to meet in real life, even given the opportunity. This skill is essential for long term success as someone will always know more about certain things than you, and that is to your advantage because learning everything about everything can be far too time consuming. It is easier just to ask those that might know thank keeping tabs on things like &#8220;Who Won the TechCrunch50?&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The last thing I wanted to talk about is social skills and networking. I am, for the most part, an introvert, but thankfully the Internet gives me a way to hide from the world, and put my best foot forward in making new connections and networking with people that I might not have had the ability to meet in real life, even given the opportunity. This skill is essential for long term success as someone will always know more about certain things than you, and that is to your advantage because learning everything about everything can be far too time consuming. It is easier just to ask those that might know thank keeping tabs on things like &#8220;Who Won the TechCrunch50?&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robdiana</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2008/09/11/yammer-nothing-else-was-better/comment-page-1/#comment-860</link>
		<dc:creator>robdiana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 22:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=115#comment-860</guid>
		<description>Marc,
Compared to Twitter, yes it is an interesting service because of the business model and additional features. Yammer probably will succeed in some way, but I just thought there were a few other options that looked like better chances. It will be interesting to see what happens to them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marc,<br />
Compared to Twitter, yes it is an interesting service because of the business model and additional features. Yammer probably will succeed in some way, but I just thought there were a few other options that looked like better chances. It will be interesting to see what happens to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Dangeard</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2008/09/11/yammer-nothing-else-was-better/comment-page-1/#comment-859</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Dangeard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 20:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=115#comment-859</guid>
		<description>The great innovation from my prospective is that they have a business model when Twitter does not seem to have one. It may look like nothing from the outside, but this is all the difference between having a real business vs. riding the hype and hoping that something will come out of it.
Having said that, I agree with you that there are a lot of questions still open regarding the business itself. I see no barrier to entry, and enterprise sales as you mention to take a long time. Even if the price is cheap, it does not mean that companies will jump on it, they need to consider the implications the tool will have on processes etc... And the idea of paying somebody to go and do the sales is not realistic when you look at the price of the license. So they will have to find the right angle to get in, hoping that while they try to figure this somebody else (or Google) does not develop something similar.
A tough road ahead...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The great innovation from my prospective is that they have a business model when Twitter does not seem to have one. It may look like nothing from the outside, but this is all the difference between having a real business vs. riding the hype and hoping that something will come out of it.<br />
Having said that, I agree with you that there are a lot of questions still open regarding the business itself. I see no barrier to entry, and enterprise sales as you mention to take a long time. Even if the price is cheap, it does not mean that companies will jump on it, they need to consider the implications the tool will have on processes etc&#8230; And the idea of paying somebody to go and do the sales is not realistic when you look at the price of the license. So they will have to find the right angle to get in, hoping that while they try to figure this somebody else (or Google) does not develop something similar.<br />
A tough road ahead&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.381 seconds -->

