<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who Owns Comments? Who Cares.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://regulargeek.com/2008/06/03/who-owns-comments-who-cares/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://regulargeek.com/2008/06/03/who-owns-comments-who-cares/</link>
	<description>Where programming, the internet and social media collide.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 19:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Comment Policy, Do You Need One? &#62;&#62; PiXELWiT</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2008/06/03/who-owns-comments-who-cares/#comment-365</link>
		<dc:creator>Comment Policy, Do You Need One? &#62;&#62; PiXELWiT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=61#comment-365</guid>
		<description>[...] Who Cares Who Owns Comments [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Who Cares Who Owns Comments [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Stewart</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2008/06/03/who-owns-comments-who-cares/#comment-361</link>
		<dc:creator>William Stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 14:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=61#comment-361</guid>
		<description>It has become borderline stupid.  As long as you *have* comments, and people are talking, that's what's important.  Does it matter whose servers, or services, it sits on, as long as it's driving thoughts and brainwaves to you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has become borderline stupid.  As long as you *have* comments, and people are talking, that&#8217;s what&#8217;s important.  Does it matter whose servers, or services, it sits on, as long as it&#8217;s driving thoughts and brainwaves to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FriendFeed and the Web Itself as a Blogging&#160;Platform &#124; André Friedrichs' Web site</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2008/06/03/who-owns-comments-who-cares/#comment-360</link>
		<dc:creator>FriendFeed and the Web Itself as a Blogging&#160;Platform &#124; André Friedrichs' Web site</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 09:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=61#comment-360</guid>
		<description>[...] the arguments around comment fragmentation take on a whole new spin, let alone the ideas of comment ownership, product evangelism and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the arguments around comment fragmentation take on a whole new spin, let alone the ideas of comment ownership, product evangelism and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FriendFeed and the Web Itself as a Blogging Platform &#124; moraaz.org - feed all tech!</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2008/06/03/who-owns-comments-who-cares/#comment-359</link>
		<dc:creator>FriendFeed and the Web Itself as a Blogging Platform &#124; moraaz.org - feed all tech!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 15:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=61#comment-359</guid>
		<description>[...] the arguments around comment fragmentation take on a whole new spin, let alone the ideas of comment ownership, product evangelism and micro-celebrity [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the arguments around comment fragmentation take on a whole new spin, let alone the ideas of comment ownership, product evangelism and micro-celebrity [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FriendFeed and the Web Itself as a Blogging Platform</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2008/06/03/who-owns-comments-who-cares/#comment-358</link>
		<dc:creator>FriendFeed and the Web Itself as a Blogging Platform</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 09:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=61#comment-358</guid>
		<description>[...] the arguments around comment fragmentation take on a whole new spin, let alone the ideas of comment ownership, product evangelism and micro-celebrity [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the arguments around comment fragmentation take on a whole new spin, let alone the ideas of comment ownership, product evangelism and micro-celebrity [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2008/06/03/who-owns-comments-who-cares/#comment-325</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 15:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=61#comment-325</guid>
		<description>Just so you know: there are people who would like to become part of a solution.  I've been working on an initiative and would actually like to speak to you personally about participation/feedback.

The madness you are exposing is something that needs to be wrangled before it gets out of control. The future of social media depends on users feeling free to express their opinions however, and wherever, they want without the risk of losing their identity or losing what they feel belongs to them. A lot of otherwise intelligent bloggers are taking a dangerously selfish stance on this topic.

I think the work you are doing with YackTrack is important. I think more needs to be done. I envision a plan that will benefit bloggers, social media service providers, services like YackTrack, and last but certainly not least the users. If you would like to open a line of communication with me then please email me at the address I left with this comment so we can get in touch via IM or the phone to talk about the future. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just so you know: there are people who would like to become part of a solution.  I&#8217;ve been working on an initiative and would actually like to speak to you personally about participation/feedback.</p>
<p>The madness you are exposing is something that needs to be wrangled before it gets out of control. The future of social media depends on users feeling free to express their opinions however, and wherever, they want without the risk of losing their identity or losing what they feel belongs to them. A lot of otherwise intelligent bloggers are taking a dangerously selfish stance on this topic.</p>
<p>I think the work you are doing with YackTrack is important. I think more needs to be done. I envision a plan that will benefit bloggers, social media service providers, services like YackTrack, and last but certainly not least the users. If you would like to open a line of communication with me then please email me at the address I left with this comment so we can get in touch via IM or the phone to talk about the future. <img src='http://regulargeek.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeffisageek</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2008/06/03/who-owns-comments-who-cares/#comment-324</link>
		<dc:creator>jeffisageek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 13:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=61#comment-324</guid>
		<description>I cant agree more with the title of your post :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cant agree more with the title of your post <img src='http://regulargeek.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: honest ape</title>
		<link>http://regulargeek.com/2008/06/03/who-owns-comments-who-cares/#comment-322</link>
		<dc:creator>honest ape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 12:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regulargeek.com/?p=61#comment-322</guid>
		<description>Okay, another point on this matter: If people are commenting on an article to interact with the author, they better do it where the author can see and respond to it. If they're commenting on it to interact with their friends, anywhere is fair game. I'm not going to kill myself trying to hunt down every comment people make about something I write.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, another point on this matter: If people are commenting on an article to interact with the author, they better do it where the author can see and respond to it. If they&#8217;re commenting on it to interact with their friends, anywhere is fair game. I&#8217;m not going to kill myself trying to hunt down every comment people make about something I write.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.692 seconds -->
